American Identy in the World essays

American Identy in the World essays Actions speak louder than words. This phrase has proven exceedingly true when one is talking about the image that America portrays to Iraqis. We as Americans can say all that we want about spreading peace and freedom, but Americans in general have no idea what other people on the other side of the world are going through so that Americans can feel safer. Iraqi writers such as Riverbend, Salam Pax, and Fadhil Al-Azzawi point out that even though America says that it is fighting for freedom, there is very little evidence of that from their side of the world. The main theme that comes out of these three writers publications is that America is there for themselves and not for the Iraqi people, and that America is not a giver of freedoms, but rather a taker of freedoms. This is not to say that America has not given Iraq some freedoms, like the freedom to not live in oppression. However it is that taking away of the small freedoms that makes an Iraqi feel free. Everything about and Iraqis daily life is difficult, whether it is worrying about car bombs, abductions, rapes, or whether they will have electricity that day or not. All of these things has made everyday tasks such as sleeping, going to school, watching television, or just listening to music a tremendous task. In Al-Azzawis poem Feast in Candlelight he says, They will drink from the same bottle and watch the evening fall among the trees. Parades of drunken soldiers wave their bloody flags and march down the street(Al-Azzawi 2). This shows the authors image of America as just a bunch of soldiers from a country drunk with power and their victory is paraded by as the righteous killing of Iraqis. As Riverbend says in her blog called Baghdad is Burning, The Iraqi people feel that they are nothing but the new communists from the Cold War era(Riverbend); meaning that they are just something that is m ...

Argentina Crisis essays

Argentina Crisis essays To truly understand the Argentina Crisis you must first know what has happened with their government within the past two years. Argentina has been in a terrible recession for the past four years. IN December 1999 newly elected president Fernando De La Rua vowed to restore the economy. Then the budget was not looking so good. Economy minister, Jose Luis Machina predicted the budget to over shoot the 5.2 billion dollar target by 10%. In March Machina said forget this and quit, to be replaced by Ricardo Lopez Murphy. Murphy steps right in presenting a tough 4.45 billion dollar two year austerity program with deep cuts in education. Distraught by these policies six government officials quit in protest and force Murphy to resign. In March 2001 Domingo Cavallo a former economy minister is appointed to try to restructure the economy. In the past two years Argentines have seen way too many faces slide through offices. This caused people to start to lose trust and hope in their government. Soon after Cavallos appointment the stock market crashes and three rating agencies slash Argentinas credit ratings. In July 2001 Murphys austerity bills are passed. Slashing state salaries and pensions by 13% and forcing an end to budget deficits. Argentines trust in their government is now completely lost. In November of that year people withdrew almost 1.3billlion dollars from their bank accounts. This worried Cavallo, so he ordered a restriction on the amount of money the pubic is allowed to withdraw from their bank accounts. This was also done to help out the banks. The pension funds that were taken are now being transformed into treasury bonds or government backed loans to pay service debts. Argentina now is in total crisis. Unemployment has risen to 18.3% and all unions are calling a strike. In December 2001 another official quits, Finance secretary Daniel Ma ...

Choose a topic that will go with the paper Essay

Choose a topic that will go with the paper - Essay Example (supplementing historical and sociological writings) that detail the problems of the average family trying to survive the tough times of The Great Depression; d) tales of women struggling for independence and self-expression in an America just before the Women’s Liberation Movement; or e) as tales of the woman’s necessity to submerge what she likes to do to the demands of domestic responsibility†¦ Here, we shall look at Olsen’s ‘I Stand Here Ironing’ (ISHI) from angle (a) mentioned above, as a story that explores the mother daughter relationship, and also touch upon the impact of the early experiences that a child has (in this case the daughter) on her ability to have a ‘well-adjusted’ childhood, and on the kind of adult she grows up to be. In ISHI, the Mother is the protagonist, standing there and doing something as mundane as ironing clothes. And while ironing, she looks up occasionally to speak with someone — perhaps a teacher, perhaps a counselor, who feels that she should be paying more attention to her daughter. There is no counselor really there — what we see of her is merely what is reflected in the mirror-monologue of the Mother. Olsen’s style may be far removed from the Shakespearean dramatic tradition. But it packs the punch of a Shakespearean soliloquy, albeit in a low-key manner. There is nothing ostensibly dramatic about the woman talking in snatches, going back and forth from present to past, dwelling on the various incidents of her life. In setting and story the scene is far removed from that of a Hamlet. But the self-searching is the same: â€Å"To be or not to be† says Hamlet in torment; â€Å"I will become engulfed with all I did or did not do, with what should have been and what I cannot help,†(Olsen 1-2) echoes Emily’s Mother. She feels guilt for what she did not do for her baby, but wonders whether she could really have done it differently. The Mother admits to herself that even when her daughter was a baby, she gave